The Biggest Threat to City Schools
New York Sun
December 31, 2004

The Biggest Threat to City Schools Contrary to popular belief, the greatest impediment to the reform of public education in New York was not the old Board of Education bureaucracy, nor is it the teachers union contract. Far more damaging is the power that educrats have themselves ceded through the settlement of various lawsuits going back generations. This practice is emerging as an underestimated crisis.

These consent decrees are the reason why tens of thousands of New York's most at-risk children are lured into the linguistic ghetto of the bilingual education program. A settlement of a prior lawsuit is the reason why a disproportionate amount of education funding goes to special education programs that generate more jobs than positive outcomes. Consent decrees are the reason why misbehaving, even dangerous, students can avoid the discipline necessary to maintain order in our most troubled schools.

Rather than fight these crippling mandates, the Bloomberg administration has agreed to even more restrictive settlements. These, like the others, undermine his ability to reform the system.

Earlier this year, the Department of Education settled a lawsuit that ended the perfectly reasonable practice of advising students over the age of 18, so far behind that it is unlikely they will graduate, to seek alternative strategies such as a General Equivalency Diploma program. Since students always had the right to stay in school to age 21 and can't be discharged without parental consent, what was the problem?

Just last week, the department settled a case brought by Charlie King, the lawyer best known as Andrew Cuomo's hapless running-mate for lieutenant governor in the one of the lamest statewide political campaigns ever. Mr. King charged that the department was out of compliance with the school transfer provisions of the No Child Left Behind law. In a technical sense this is true, but the provisions are such that every other large American city has also found compliance impossible.

The reason is that the definition of what constitutes a "failing school" is unrealistically broad, soon to include virtually every one. Schools not eligible for NCLB funding can never be considered failing schools, no matter how low the scores. Last year, many New York children were transferred from "failing" schools with larger numbers of children in poverty to 100 other "failing" schools with slightly lower numbers of children eligible for free lunch.

Even the numbers used to define a school's eligibility for NCLB funds make no sense. In the Bronx last year, a school needed 69% of its students on free lunch in order to qualify. In Yonkers, the figure is 10%. Because all New York City is considered one school district, children can be transferred anywhere within, but not beyond. A child attending a "failing" school in the northeast Bronx community of Baychester can be bused an hour to Queens, but never to Pelham Manor in Westchester, just five minutes from home.

Home Page     Events and Information   Awards&Scholarships   AABE News 2005  NEWS (2004)      News( 2003)       News(2002)       Publications      Board_Information     Board Contact     Goals      Feedback     Research Links     Links       ALEC WEBSITE