| 
 
http://www.enterprisenews.com/display/inn_news/News/news02.txt 
Bilingual education ballot question panned at Brockton rally 
 
By Sean Flynn, Enterprise staff writer 
 
BROCKTON   More than 150 people rallied Wednesday night on City Hall 
Plaza, calling for the defeat of ballot 
Question 2, which would ban the state's new language-education law and put all 
non-English speaking students in 
"sheltered immersion classes" for one school year. 
 
"If you think you can learn a second language in 180 days, why don't you speak a 
second language?" read a sign 
held by Soria Monteiro.  
 
Voters will decide the issue at the polls on Tuesday. 
 
Monteiro, now a student in regular classes at Brockton High School, came to the 
United States from Cape Verde in 
1999 and spent two years in the city's bilingual program. 
 
"If not for the support of bilingual education teachers, I would not be in 
mainstream classes today," she said to cheers 
from the crowd. 
 
In August, the governor signed a new law that gives schools a wide choice of 
language programs for students. The 
options include immersion classes, two-way language programs, 
English-as-a-second-language or more traditional 
bilingual programs. 
 
"We must give the law a chance to work," Catherine Boudreau, president of the 
Massachusetts Teachers Association, 
said at the rally. 
 
School districts need to be able to choose which language program works best for 
their students, said Mayor John T. 
Yunits Jr.  
 
"This is forcing a program, that has not been proven to work, down our throats," 
he said. 
 
Students, teachers and community leaders took turns coming to the loudspeaker to 
oppose the initiative. It's on the 
ballot because of the financing and efforts of Ron Unz, a multimillionaire and 
former Republican candidate for 
governor in California. 
 
"We don't need outsiders coming here and telling us how to fix our education 
system," said Moises Rodrigues, past 
president and board member of the Cape Verdean Association. 
 
"I'm a product of bilingual education," he said. "I learned English as a fifth 
language." 
 
The question has become a divisive issue in the governor's race, with Republican 
Mitt Romney backing it and 
Democrat Shannon O'Brien opposing it. 
 
"The question is a waste of time, energy and effort," said state Rep. Thomas 
Kennedy, D-Brockton. 
 
Unz was successful in getting the initiative passed in California in 1998, but 
speakers in Brockton said the program has 
failed there. 
 
State Rep. Tony Cabral, D-New Bedford, said only 8 to 9 percent of non-native 
English learners transition to 
mainstream classes each year in California, while 25 percent of bilingual 
students in Massachusetts make the 
transition each year. "We don't need an immersion from Mr. Unz," said Cabral. 
 
"The initiative is a proven failure in California," said Robert Vitello, past 
president of the Massachusetts Association of 
Teachers of Speakers of Other Languages.  
 
Soraya de Barros Andrade came here from Cape Verde in 1991, and is now a 
bilingual education teacher at the 
Belmont Street Elementary School. 
 
"The future of more than 44,000 bilingual students in Massachusetts is being 
threatened," said de Barros Andrade. 
 
Speakers cited the high dropout rates of Hispanic students in Massachusetts 
before the current bilingual education 
program was established in the early 1970s. 
 
"Lest we forget history, bilingual education was an affirmative response to the 
failed English-only programs for 
language minority students of the 1950s through the 1970s when children were 
repeatedly belittled, humiliated and 
even punished for speaking their primary language in school," de Barros Andrade 
said. 
 
Prejudice underlies the ballot question, some speakers said. 
 
Proponents "continually recite the anti-immigrant and anti-teacher rhetoric that 
has been floating around for years," 
said Kellie Jones, an English-as-second-language teacher in Brockton. "However, 
these arguments are just lies." 
 
Unz and Mitt Romney, in support of the ballot question, have argued that past 
immigrants came here and learned 
English without native-language support in the schools.  
 
But Jones cited a 1931 federal immigration report that stated only 11 percent of 
Italian-speaking students in New York 
City graduated from high school.  
 
"Clearly, there was no golden age of immigration and assimilation," she said. 
 
Jones said bilingual programs were dismantled after the outbreak of World War I 
and there was a marked increase in 
the dropout rate for foreign-language speakers.  
 
The program was re-established in this state in 1974, she said, to allow 
students to keep pace with peers in the same 
grade while they learn English. 
 
"It is Question 2 that will ghetto-ize second-language learners," she said. 
 
Supporters of the question say students linger for years in bilingual programs, 
but Jones said students stay in bilingual 
programs an average of 2.7 years in Brockton, and an average of 2.6 years in 
Boston. 
 
Voters may not have received accurate information about ballot Question 2, a 
government expert and state lawmaker 
said. 
 
The state Secretary of State sent out voter information packets that failed to 
contain information about the new 
language-education law, said Charles Glick of Charles Group Consulting in 
Boston. 
 
"As a result, millions of Massachusetts voters have intentionally been kept in 
the dark about the recent comprehensive 
reform," the public-affairs consultant wrote in an Oct. 18 letter to state Rep. 
Peter J. Larkin, House chairman of the 
Committee on Education, Arts and Humanities. 
 
Larkin sent Glick's letter to news outlets. 
 
" The truth is that Question 2 would replace the comprehensive new reform that 
has already taken the place of the old 
transitional bilingual-education law," Larkin wrote in a letter to the editor.
 
  
 |